Use these three responses to complete the relevant questions on the government form advocating for a non-statutory definition of Islamophobia.
You can find the form here.
Response to Question 7:
“Islamophobia” is the most accurate and widely accepted term. It captures how Muslims are targeted not for belief but for perceived identity, language, dress, names, or ethnicity. The term reflects structural and institutional racism that impacts housing, education, employment, and policing. It is recognised by Muslim communities and aligns with how racism is addressed in law. In contrast, “anti-Muslim hatred” implies isolated incidents, obscuring the systemic nature of the problem.
Response to Question 9:
A non-statutory definition of Islamophobia is needed to reflect how Muslims experience prejudice—through both race and religion. The Equality Act 2010 (s.9(4) & 14) recognises racial groups can include multiple ethnicities and overlapping characteristics. Islamophobia captures institutional bias and racialised microaggressions that go beyond hate crime incidents. The ECHR and ECJ already recognise this interplay. Legal parity with Sikhs and Jews requires acknowledging Islamophobia as a racialised form of discrimination in UK policy.
Response to Question 11:
Defining Islamophobia as a form of racialised religious prejudice reflects clear evidence from UK institutions. The Aziz Foundation’s Barriers to Bridges report highlights structural exclusion and media stereotyping of Muslims. Universities UK urges action on Islamophobia as a systemic issue. The APPG definition is endorsed by over 50 councils, many universities, and several police forces. Concerns that a non-statutory definition limits free speech are unfounded. Legal experts and civil liberties groups confirm that adopting the definition does not criminalise criticism of Islamic beliefs or practices. Rather, it offers a framework to identify and challenge hate, discrimination, and racialised targeting of Muslims. Critiquing religion remains protected under Article 10 of the ECHR. What the definition addresses is the vilification of individuals or communities based on perceived Muslim identity. A clear, non-statutory definition protects rights while enabling accountability.
Why a non-statutory definition of Islamophobia is better than anti-Muslim hatred